Whenever an article starts gaining popularity that does not praise vaccines as the greatest medical innovation of the last thousand years, you will hear many say things like “Sure, lets just let small pox and polio come back”. They say this like it is a scientific certainty that vaccines eradicated these diseases and to question it is blasphemy.
But is it true?
Sadly, the answer is unequivocally NO.
If you look at the charts of the rates of mortality and incidences for the many of the “vaccine preventable” diseases, you will see that the decline happened well before the vaccinations were even introduced.
Tuberculosis mortality in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) in the years 1956-1988:
The number of Tuberculosis cases in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) in the years 1949-1987:
Whooping Cough Mortality:
Measles Mortality in England and Whales 1901-1999:
Measles cases and mortality in the US:
Scarlet Fever and Typhoid Mortality (no vaccines were ever made for these):
USA Disease Mortality 1900 to 1965 Measles, Typhoid, Pertussis (Whooping Cough), Diphtheria, Scarlet Fever – Published: Roman Bystrianyk:
As you can see from these charts, the diseases that vaccines claim to have eradicated were already on the way out before the vaccinations were even introduced. If vaccines were never introduced for these diseases, they would have died off naturally just like Scarlet Fever, Typhoid, Yellow Fever and even the Bubonic Plague.
The claim that vaccines eradicated these is not backed by science. In fact, the science suggests that better nutrition, access to cleaner water, better personal hygiene and overall better living conditions lead to the eradication of the diseases. Something else that is never talked about by the vaccine industry is that each disease of plague has a natural life span, so to speak. This almost certainly had something to do with the eradication.
In future articles, I will show the only thing vaccines benefitted and it is nothing close to being health. But for the remainder of this article, I want to focus on the two diseases that are most used by people when they make fear-mongering comments…
Small pox and Polio.
Small pox was one of the first vaccines introduced, so it is hard to find stats on the rates before they started mass vaccination. But I would wager a guess that this may actually be the one disease that had a very high mortality rate when the program started.
However, this does not prove that the vaccine program eradicated it.
An interesting thing started happening when they started to mass vaccinate. The vaccine quickly started killing more people than the actual disease. Unfortunately, this is something that is still seen with todays vaccines.
The town of Leicester, England caught on to this and started to forego vaccinations. In result, the town started seeing better results with small pox cases and deaths.
In 1912, in the midst of the epidemic Leicester :sanitation versus vaccination was published. The book’s author, J. T. Biggs, showed just how much better this largely unvaccinated city was doing compared to the rest of the highly vaccinated areas.
Here is table 21 from the book:
SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with “unprotected” Leicester – 1860 to 1908.
|Name.||Period.||Small-Pox. Cases||Small-Pox. Deaths.||Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases|
|British Army (United Kingdom)||1860-1908||1,355||96||7.1|
|British Army (India)||1860-1908||2,753||307||11.1|
|British Army (Colonies)||1860-1908||934||82||8.8|
|Grand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all||296,730||78,134||26.3|
|Leicester (since giving up vaccination)||1880-1908||1,206||61||5.1|
Biggs said “In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—but on the opposite side.“
Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared
|Vaccinal Condition||Small-Pox Cases||Small-Pox Deaths||Fatality-rate Per Cent||Cost of Epidemic|
|London 1900-02||Well Vaccinated||9,659||1,594||16.50||£492,000|
|Glasgow 1900-02||Well Vaccinated||3,417||377||11.03||£ 150,000|
|Sheffield 1887-88||Well Vaccinated||7,066||688||9.73||£32,257|
|Leicester 1892-94||Practically Unvaccinated||393||21||5.34||£2,888|
|Leicester 1902-04||Practically Unvaccinated||731||30||4.10||£1,602|
So, not only was the vaccine deadly, the unvaccinated contracted smallpox far less and when they were unfortunate enough to contract it they died far less. It is clear small pox was not eradicated by the vaccine. In fact, the evidence suggest that the vaccine gave you the disease- and made it more deadly as well.
So that leaves the most used disease to fear-monger us into getting shots filled with very dangerous chemicals; Polio. I have seen enough pictures of the iron lung with the caption “anti vaxxers want these to come back” to realize I don’t want to be put in one of those.
But again, this does not prove that vaccines eradicated Polio.
Dr. Bernard Greenberg, who during the polio epidemics of the 50’s, chaired the Committee on Evaluation and Standards for the American Public Health Association, testified in front of the Congressional hearing on the Polio vaccine. During these hearings he talked on the problems associated with Polio statistics and disputed claims for the vaccine’s effectiveness. He states: “Prior to 1954 any physician who reported paralytic poliomyelitis was doing his patient a service by way of subsidizing the cost of hospitalization and was being community-minded in reporting a communicable disease. The criteria of the diagnosis at that time in most health departments followed the World Health Organization definition: “Spinal paralytic poliomyelitis: signs and symptoms of non-paralytic poliomyelitis with the addition of partial or complete paralysis of one or more muscle groups, detected on two examinations at least 24 hours apart.” Note that “two examinations at least 24 hours apart” was all that was required. Laboratory confirmation and presence of residual paralysis was not required. In 1955 the criteria was changed to conform more closely to the definition used in the 1954 field trials: residual paralysis was determined 10 to 20 days after onset of illness and again 50 to 70 days after onset…. This change in definition meant that in 1955 we started reporting a new disease, namely, paralytic poliomyelitis with a longer-lasting paralysis. Furthermore, diagnostic procedures have continued to be refined. Coxsackie virus infections and aseptic meningitis have been distinguished from paralytic poliomyelitis. Prior to 1954 large numbers of these cases undoubtedly were mislabeled as paralytic poliomyelitis. Thus, simply by changes in diagnostic criteria, the number of paralytic cases was predetermined to decrease in 1955-1957, whether or not any vaccine was used.”
As you can see the vaccine did not cure or eradicate polio, they simply changed the diagnostic requirement for diagnosing polio. After 1955 (the year after the introduction of the vaccine) only the most severe cases got diagnosed as polio. This change artificially lowered the cases to make it look like the vaccine did it!
People still regurgitate this “vaccine eradicated polio” nonsense even though it is still here today used under multiple names.
The hard truth is we have been tricked. Vaccines have never eradicated any disease they claim to. It is just industry propaganda that is seriously harming countless children. The people who blindly regurgitate the vaccine claims coming from the industry and government need to wake up, because vaccines are not the way to provide and maintain good health– building your immune system is.